vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Forestar Group Inc. (FOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $273.0M, roughly 1.2× Forestar Group Inc.). Forestar Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs 4.3%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 9.0%). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.4M vs $-157.1M). Over the past eight quarters, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -9.6%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...
AIN vs FOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $273.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $15.4M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 7.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $273.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $670.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $390.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $351.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $250.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $551.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $318.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $333.8M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $86.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $31.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $81.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $38.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $45.0M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 17.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $1.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $1.59 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $211.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $793.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $211.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $379.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $189.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $174.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $132.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $481.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $359.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $416.2M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $793.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $802.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $872.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $872.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $806.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $706.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $706.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | $705.7M |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 0.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $-157.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $-157.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | -57.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | -10.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $93.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $-157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $256.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $-450.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $-61.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $-59.2M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $-157.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $255.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $-20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $-59.8M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | -57.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | -17.9% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | -10.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | -0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | -27.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | -1.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | -1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
FOR
| D.R.Horton Inc. | $183.8M | 67% |
| Other | $89.2M | 33% |
