vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Frontdoor, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($433.0M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.3× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs 0.2%, a 4.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Frontdoor, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.1% vs 12.0%). Frontdoor, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($94.0M vs $51.4M). Over the past eight quarters, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -10.6%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Frontdoor, Inc. operates a leading U.S.-focused home services and protection platform. It offers customizable home warranty plans covering repairs and replacements for household appliances, HVAC, plumbing, and electrical systems, plus on-demand access to a network of pre-vetted local service professionals for residential maintenance and repairs.
AIN vs FTDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $433.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $1.0M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 49.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 13.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $433.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $432.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $618.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $426.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $383.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $540.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $542.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $106.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $111.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 57.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 55.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 48.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 56.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 56.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 22.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 17.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $1.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $1.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $1.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $566.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $242.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 4.85× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $566.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $566.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $563.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $562.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $506.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $436.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $375.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $419.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $565.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $569.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $242.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $242.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $316.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $254.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $198.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $239.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $261.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $214.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.85× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 4.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 3.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 4.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 5.88× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 4.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 2.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 2.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $94.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 21.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $367.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $127.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $124.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $103.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $94.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $95.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $120.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $117.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $91.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 16.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 101.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 3.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 6.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 0.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
FTDR
Segment breakdown not available.
