vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GigaCloud Technology Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($332.6M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.0× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). GigaCloud Technology Inc runs the higher net margin — 11.2% vs 4.3%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 9.7%). GigaCloud Technology Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($77.1M vs $51.4M). Over the past eight quarters, GigaCloud Technology Inc's revenue compounded faster (36.6% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
GigaCloud Technology Inc. is an American e-commerce company that helps retailers buy and sell big and bulky, non-standardized items such as furniture, appliances, and fitness equipment. They own a business-to-business online marketplace and act as a middleman by handling sales, logistics and also delivery to end customers. GigaCloud is headquartered in El Monte, California, and is listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange since August 2022.
AIN vs GCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $332.6M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $37.2M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 12.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 11.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 9.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -8.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $332.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $322.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $271.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $295.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $303.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $310.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $251.1M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $34.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $40.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $27.2M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 23.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 13.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 10.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.99 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.68 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.98 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $365.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $457.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $365.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $303.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $286.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $302.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $259.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $207.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $195.3M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $457.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $431.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $412.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $405.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $400.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $358.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $317.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $977.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $78.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $77.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 23.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 2.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $188.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $78.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $68.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $55.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $15.3M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $77.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $66.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $12.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 23.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 1.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 0.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 2.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 0.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
GCT
| Services | $108.4M | 33% |
| Transferred Over Time | $89.8M | 27% |
| Product Sales To B | $50.1M | 15% |
| Last Mile Delivery Service | $49.2M | 15% |
| Warehousing Service | $14.2M | 4% |
| Ocean Transportation Service | $9.0M | 3% |
| Platform Commission | $4.9M | 1% |
| Drayage Service | $3.2M | 1% |
