vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Getty Images Holdings, Inc. (GETY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $282.3M, roughly 1.1× Getty Images Holdings, Inc.). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -32.2%, a 36.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Getty Images Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.1% vs 12.0%). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.4M vs $7.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Getty Images Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.7% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Getty Images Holdings, Inc. is a visual media company and supplier of stock images, editorial photography, video, and music for businesses and consumers, with a library of over 477 million assets. It targets three markets—creative professionals, the media, and corporate.
AIN vs GETY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $282.3M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $-90.9M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 74.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | -8.5% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -32.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 14.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -467.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $282.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $240.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $234.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $224.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $247.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $229.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $222.3M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $-90.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $-34.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $-102.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $13.6M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 74.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 73.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 72.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 73.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 73.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 73.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 72.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 72.9% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | -8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 18.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -32.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | -14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -45.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $90.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $1.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $552.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 2.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $90.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $109.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $110.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $114.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $121.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $109.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $134.2M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $552.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $634.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $611.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $593.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $670.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $683.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $654.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $640.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 2.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 2.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 2.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 2.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $20.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $7.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 2.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $5.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $15.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $21.5M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $-322.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $24.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 6.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 12.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 1.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
GETY
| Creative | $149.0M | 53% |
| Editorial | $109.4M | 39% |
| Other | $23.9M | 8% |
