vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($420.0M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.3× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs 4.3%, a 52.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 6.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
AIN vs GLPI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $420.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $239.4M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 79.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 57.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 40.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $407.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $397.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $394.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $395.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $389.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $385.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $380.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $239.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $151.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $165.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $223.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $184.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $208.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 89.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 65.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 70.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 77.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 57.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 54.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $274.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $274.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $560.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $6.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $12.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $11.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 1.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $293.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $252.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $270.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $252.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $183.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $272.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $239.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $261.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $245.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 275.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 64.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
GLPI
Segment breakdown not available.
