vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.7× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 4.3%, a 25.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
AIN vs KIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $558.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $166.3M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 37.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 23.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $542.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $535.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $536.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $525.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $507.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $500.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $137.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $132.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $119.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 32.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 23.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $19.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $131.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $126.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $10.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $19.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $19.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $19.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $305.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $294.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 1.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 2.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
