vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $253.4M, roughly 1.3× Palomar Holdings, Inc.). On growth, Palomar Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (62.7% vs 12.0%). Palomar Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($409.0M vs $51.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Palomar Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (46.2% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that primarily provides property insurance products for catastrophe-exposed residential and commercial assets. It mainly operates across the United States, focusing on core segments including earthquake, flood, and windstorm coverage to meet high-risk property protection demands of customers.
AIN vs PLMR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $253.4M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | — |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 28.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 62.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $2.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $253.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $244.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $203.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $174.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $131.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $118.5M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $46.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $26.4M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 29.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 22.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $2.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $1.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $1.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $1.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $1.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $106.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $942.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $3.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $106.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $81.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $119.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $80.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $47.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $61.4M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $942.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $878.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $847.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $790.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $729.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $703.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $532.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $501.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $409.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $409.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 161.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $700.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $409.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $87.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $261.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $100.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $33.1M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $409.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $120.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $100.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 161.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 59.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 49.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 167.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 67.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 2.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 2.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 2.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 1.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
PLMR
Segment breakdown not available.
