vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (SEDG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($335.4M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.0× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -39.4%, a 43.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (70.9% vs 12.0%). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.4M vs $43.3M). Over the past eight quarters, SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. is an Israeli company that developed a DC optimized inverter system.
AIN vs SEDG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $335.4M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $-132.1M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 22.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | -14.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -39.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 70.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 54.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $-2.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $335.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $340.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $289.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $219.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $196.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $265.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $204.4M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $-132.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $-50.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $-124.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $-98.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $-287.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $-130.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $-157.3M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | -57.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -309.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | -12.8% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | -14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | -46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | -134.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -471.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | -60.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | -85.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -39.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | -14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | -43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -44.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | -146.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | -522.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -49.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | -77.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $-2.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $-2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $-1.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $-5.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $-21.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $-2.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $-2.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $493.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $427.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $493.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $498.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $758.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $651.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $585.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $678.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $689.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $680.6M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $427.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $479.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $513.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $594.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $658.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $930.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $52.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $43.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 12.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 2.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $80.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $52.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $33.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $-89.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $-217.0M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $43.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $25.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $-136.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $-67.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $-243.4M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | -58.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | -25.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | -119.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 12.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
SEDG
| Other | $197.7M | 59% |
| Europe Except Netherlands | $99.4M | 30% |
| Others | $38.2M | 11% |
