vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($307.3M vs $224.2M, roughly 1.4× STAG Industrial, Inc.). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs -20.7%, a 48.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STAG Industrial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs -0.2%). Over the past eight quarters, STAG Industrial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
OXM vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $307.3M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | $-63.7M | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -20.7% | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.2% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1517.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.28 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $307.3M | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.1M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.9M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.0M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.9M | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.2M | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-63.7M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.7M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.6M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -27.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.28 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.70 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.57 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.0M | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.0M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $528.0M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $597.1M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.4M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.2M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $592.9M | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-9.1M | $104.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.5M | $143.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $111.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.2M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.8M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | $122.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-47.9M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.4M | $62.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.9M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.2M | $86.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $105.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.6% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.00× | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.15× | 2.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.19× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
STAG
Segment breakdown not available.
