vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.5× T1 Energy Inc.). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -62.0%, a 66.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. T1 Energy Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.0M vs $51.4M).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
AIN vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $-28.5M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | -44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $219.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $249.9M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $603.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | $602.3M |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $201.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $561.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $582.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $644.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $670.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 1.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $-16.2M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $-37.7M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | -138.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 54.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
