vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $199.5M, roughly 1.6× VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs 3.6%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs -4.1%). Over the past eight quarters, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -5.7%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.VRTSEarnings & Financial Report
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.
AIN vs VRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $199.5M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $7.1M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 7.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | -4.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -78.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $216.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $224.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $42.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 11.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $5.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $4.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $6.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $4.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $4.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $5.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $2.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $136.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $93.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $136.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $237.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $247.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $93.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $934.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $918.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $896.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $893.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $897.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $889.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $868.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $-67.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $75.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $-74.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $68.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | -1.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
VRTS
| Investment management fees | $169.1M | 85% |
| Administration and shareholder service fees | $17.3M | 9% |
| Distribution and service fees | $11.6M | 6% |
