vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and WORKIVA INC (WK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $238.9M, roughly 1.3× WORKIVA INC). WORKIVA INC runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs 4.3%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WORKIVA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs 12.0%). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.4M vs $50.7M). Over the past eight quarters, WORKIVA INC's revenue compounded faster (16.0% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Workiva, Inc. is a global software-as-a-service (SaaS) company. It provides a cloud-based connected and reporting compliance platform that enables the use of connected data and automation of reporting across finance, accounting, risk, and compliance.
AIN vs WK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $238.9M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $11.8M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 22.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 19.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $238.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $238.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $215.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $206.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $199.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $185.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $-17.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 80.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 80.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 79.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 77.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 76.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 76.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | -12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | -13.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -9.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $-0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $338.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $338.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $338.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $315.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $242.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $301.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $248.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $267.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $-36.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $-66.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $-75.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $-41.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $-50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $-77.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $51.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $50.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 21.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 4.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $196.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $46.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $-14.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $50.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $-122.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | -0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.31× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 4.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
WK
| Subscription and support | $219.3M | 92% |
| Other | $19.6M | 8% |
