vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and WillScot Holdings Corp (WSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WillScot Holdings Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($566.0M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.8× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -33.1%, a 37.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs -6.1%). WillScot Holdings Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($149.7M vs $51.4M). Over the past eight quarters, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
WillScot Holdings Corp is a leading provider of modular space solutions and portable storage services across North America. It serves a wide range of sectors including construction, commercial development, education, healthcare, government projects, and special events, offering flexible, scalable temporary and semi-permanent space solutions tailored to diverse client needs.
AIN vs WSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $566.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $-187.3M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | -32.5% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -33.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | -6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -310.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $-1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $566.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $566.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $589.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $559.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $602.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $601.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $604.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $587.2M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $-187.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $43.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $43.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $-70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $56.2M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 49.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 50.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 54.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 54.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | -32.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 21.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 22.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | -11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 9.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $-1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $14.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $3.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $856.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $5.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 4.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $856.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $6.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 4.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 3.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 3.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 3.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 3.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 2.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 2.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $158.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $149.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 26.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $737.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $158.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $205.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $206.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $178.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $175.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $208.7M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $186.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $199.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $202.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $169.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $202.1M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | 34.4% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 4.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 4.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 3.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
WSC
| Modular Space Leasing | $249.8M | 44% |
| Value Added Product And Services | $101.0M | 18% |
| Portable Storage Leasing | $83.0M | 15% |
| Delivery Revenue | $48.2M | 9% |
| Installation Revenue | $45.0M | 8% |
| Rental Units | $19.7M | 3% |
| New Units | $15.5M | 3% |
| Value Added Services | $10.3M | 2% |
| Other Leasing Related Products And Services | $3.8M | 1% |
