vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.1M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.9× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 4.3%, a 9.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 12.0%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $51.4M). Over the past eight quarters, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
AIN vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.
