vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AIxCrypto Holdings, Inc. (AIXC) and Chime Financial, Inc. (CHYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AIxCrypto Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1488.6% vs -10.1%, a 1498.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Chime Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.8% vs -108.5%).
Chime Financial, Inc. is an American financial technology company based in San Francisco, California. It provides fee-free mobile banking services through two national banks, Stride Bank and The Bancorp Bank.
AIXC vs CHYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2024 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $-136.6K | $543.5M |
| Net Profit | $-2.0M | $-54.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1041.1% | -11.9% |
| Net Margin | 1488.6% | -10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -108.5% | 28.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 47.1% | -148.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-17.60 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $543.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $528.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $421.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $384.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-136.6K | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $1.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-54.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-923.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $385.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-6.4M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-4.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 87.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 87.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 93.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 95.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -176.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1041.1% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -154.0% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -240.8% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -289.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -174.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1488.6% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -458.5% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -265.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -288.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.60 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-1.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $445.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-3.5M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.0M | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $445.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $868.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $270.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $295.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $14.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $23.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $26.3M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-783.6K | $17.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $15.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-783.6K | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-3.2M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-3.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-3.2M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-4.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -167.5% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -221.6% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -276.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 1.0% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIXC
Segment breakdown not available.
CHYM
| Payments Revenue | $363.2M | 67% |
| Platform Related Revenue | $180.4M | 33% |
