vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (BMNR) and Chime Financial, Inc. (CHYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chime Financial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($543.5M vs $2.3M, roughly 237.0× BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). Chime Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -10.1% vs -226955.7%, a 226945.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (90.9% vs 28.8%). Chime Financial, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.4M vs $-228.7M).
Bitmine Immersion Technologies is a tech firm focused on developing and providing professional immersion cooling solutions for high-performance computing scenarios, including cryptocurrency mining rig clusters and data center infrastructure. Its products boost hardware operating efficiency, cut energy consumption for heat control, extend high-power computing equipment lifespan, and help clients reduce long-term operational costs.
Chime Financial, Inc. is an American financial technology company based in San Francisco, California. It provides fee-free mobile banking services through two national banks, Stride Bank and The Bancorp Bank.
BMNR vs CHYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3M | $543.5M |
| Net Profit | $-5.2B | $-54.7M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 87.2% |
| Operating Margin | -238564.8% | -11.9% |
| Net Margin | -226955.7% | -10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 90.9% | 28.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -533796.8% | -148.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-15.98 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $543.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $528.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $421.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $384.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-54.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-923.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $385.0K |
| Q4 25 | 55.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 87.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 87.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.9% |
| Q4 25 | -238564.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -176.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | -226955.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -174.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-15.98 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $887.7M | $445.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.3B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $11.5B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $887.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $445.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $868.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $270.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $295.4M |
| Q4 25 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $11.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-228.4M | $17.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-228.7M | $15.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -9975.2% | 2.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.4% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-228.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-228.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -9975.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BMNR
Segment breakdown not available.
CHYM
| Payments Revenue | $363.2M | 67% |
| Platform Related Revenue | $180.4M | 33% |
