vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA REALTY TRUST (AKR) and Repay Holdings Corp (RPAY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACADIA REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($103.0M vs $78.6M, roughly 1.3× Repay Holdings Corp). ACADIA REALTY TRUST runs the higher net margin — 135.1% vs -178.3%, a 313.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Repay Holdings Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, ACADIA REALTY TRUST's revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Acadia Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that specializes in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily in dense, high-barrier-to-entry U.S. markets. Its portfolio includes neighborhood shopping centers, urban street retail assets, and community-focused mixed-use developments.
Repay Holdings Corp is a leading payment technology provider delivering integrated end-to-end payment processing solutions for businesses across North America. Its offerings include credit/debit card processing, ACH transfer services, POS system integrations and digital payment tools, serving retail, healthcare, automotive and e-commerce segments to help clients streamline transaction workflows and boost operational efficiency.
AKR vs RPAY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $103.0M | $78.6M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | $-140.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.2% |
| Operating Margin | 153.9% | -182.2% |
| Net Margin | 135.1% | -178.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.2% | -3304.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $75.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $77.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $79.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.3M | $74.9M |
| Q1 26 | $139.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-140.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-102.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-4.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 75.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 75.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 78.2% |
| Q1 26 | 153.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -182.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -138.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | -4.6% |
| Q1 26 | 135.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -178.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -135.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | -5.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $115.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $280.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $484.4M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $115.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $95.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $162.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $165.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $189.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $168.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $147.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $280.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $279.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $279.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $497.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $496.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $496.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $435.6M |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $484.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $616.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $633.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $755.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $761.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $754.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $815.4M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | 0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $23.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 29.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $90.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $34.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $31.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $59.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | 18.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AKR
| Rental | $98.6M | 96% |
| Other | $4.4M | 4% |
RPAY
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $69.4M | 88% |
| Other | $6.8M | 9% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $2.3M | 3% |
