vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and CACI INTERNATIONAL INC (CACI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.4B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.6× Albemarle Corporation). CACI INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs -29.0%, a 34.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 8.5%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $221.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CACI INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (7.4% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
CACI International Inc is a U.S.-headquartered multinational professional services and information technology firm. It delivers custom technology solutions, cybersecurity services, data analytics, and mission-critical operational support to government defense, intelligence, civilian agencies, and select private sector clients.
ALB vs CACI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.4B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $130.4M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 8.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 16.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $5.88 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $130.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $123.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $157.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $111.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $109.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $120.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $134.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.88 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $5.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $5.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $7.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $5.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $4.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $5.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $5.97 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $158.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $5.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $11.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 1.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $158.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $423.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $133.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $106.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $223.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $175.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $440.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $134.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $8.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $8.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $6.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 0.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 0.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 0.44× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $248.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $221.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $641.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $248.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $154.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $171.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $156.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $230.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $126.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $157.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $221.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $138.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $154.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $128.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $214.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $116.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $134.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 0.99× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 2.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
CACI
Segment breakdown not available.
