vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Fabrinet (FN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× Fabrinet). Fabrinet runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs -29.0%, a 38.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs 15.9%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $-5.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Fabrinet's revenue compounded faster (24.4% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
ALB vs FN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $112.6M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 35.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 30.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $3.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $978.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $909.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $871.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $833.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $804.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $753.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $731.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $87.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $77.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $81.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $80.9M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $3.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $2.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $2.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $2.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $2.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $2.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $2.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $960.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $960.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $968.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $934.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $950.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $934.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $908.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $858.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $794.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $46.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $-5.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $102.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $74.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $115.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $83.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $83.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $100.9M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $62.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $87.3M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 0.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
