vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× Gen Digital). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -29.0%, a 44.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 15.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
ALB vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
