vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and SCANSOURCE, INC. (SCSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $766.5M, roughly 1.9× SCANSOURCE, INC.). SCANSOURCE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -29.0%, a 31.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 2.5%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $28.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Albemarle Corporation's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs 0.9%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
ScanSource, Inc. is a leading global specialty technology distributor offering a broad portfolio of solutions including point-of-sale systems, barcode scanning tools, cybersecurity products, cloud services and communication solutions. It primarily serves value-added resellers, managed service providers and enterprise clients across North America, Latin America and Europe, covering retail, healthcare, industrial and public sector core segments.
ALB vs SCSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $766.5M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $16.5M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -3.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $766.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $739.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $812.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $704.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $747.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $775.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $746.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $752.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $83.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $910.9M |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $124.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $126.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $146.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $110.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $185.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $159.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $910.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $914.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $906.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $901.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $900.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $920.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $924.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $944.1M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $30.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $28.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.87× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $30.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $66.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $160.2M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $157.7M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 21.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 3.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | -0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 12.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
SCSC
| Products And Services | $723.4M | 94% |
| Intelisys Advisory | $25.0M | 3% |
| Recurring Revenue | $18.2M | 2% |
