vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× Snap-on). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs -29.0%, a 50.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 2.7%). Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $233.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Albemarle Corporation's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs 2.0%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
ALB vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
