vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.2× Albemarle Corporation). SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 13.7% vs -29.0%, a 42.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 8.8%). Over the past eight quarters, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
ALB vs SSNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $226.1M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $226.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $193.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $180.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $248.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $190.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $420.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $7.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $462.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $388.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $480.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $515.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $567.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $694.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $462.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $299.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $299.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $643.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $372.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $272.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $486.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $384.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $633.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $259.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $466.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $310.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $374.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |
