vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.9× Albemarle Corporation). Molson Coors Beverage Company runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs -29.0%, a 34.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 2.0%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $-212.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Albemarle Corporation's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs -15.8%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Molson Coors Beverage Company is a Canadian-American multinational drink and brewing company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and Montreal, Quebec.
ALB vs TAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $150.1M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 25.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $150.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $238.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $428.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $287.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $427.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 34.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | -98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $-14.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $2.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $382.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $3.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $10.3B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $22.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $896.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $950.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $613.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $412.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $969.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $7.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $13.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $22.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $26.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $25.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $27.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $-212.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | -7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $718.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $494.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $521.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $869.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-212.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $-328.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $383.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $691.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | -0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
TAP
Segment breakdown not available.