vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and UPBOUND GROUP, INC. (UPBD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× UPBOUND GROUP, INC.). UPBOUND GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs -29.0%, a 30.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 10.9%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $24.0M). Over the past eight quarters, UPBOUND GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (4.5% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Upbound Group, Inc. is a leading US provider of flexible lease-to-own solutions for consumer goods. It offers furniture, consumer electronics, home appliances, and accessories, catering to customers seeking accessible payment alternatives to traditional retail financing.
ALB vs UPBD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $19.7M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 4.8% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -36.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 48.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 47.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 48.3% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 5.6% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $120.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $695.7M |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $120.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $107.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $107.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $82.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $84.8M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $695.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $687.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $685.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $679.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $629.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $611.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $596.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $578.3M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $41.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $24.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 2.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $238.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $41.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $137.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $-61.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $106.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $45.4M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $97.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $127.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $613.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $33.6M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.96× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 5.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | -2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 1.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
UPBD
Segment breakdown not available.