vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp (VAC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp). Albemarle Corporation runs the higher net margin — -29.0% vs -35.0%, a 6.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -0.7%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $-6.0M). Over the past eight quarters, MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation is a pure-play public timeshare company. Formerly a division of Marriott International, Marriott Vacations Worldwide was established as a separate, publicly traded entity focusing primarily on vacation ownership in November 2011. Marriott Vacations Worldwide runs more than 120 resorts with over 700,000 Owners and members in a diverse portfolio of brands under The Marriott Vacation Clubs name. Its brands include Marriott Vacation Club, The Marriott Vaca...
ALB vs VAC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $-431.0M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | -35.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -962.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $-12.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $-431.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | -35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $-12.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $1.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $1.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $406.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $406.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $474.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $196.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $197.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $206.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $237.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $9.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $6.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $-6.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $-29.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $-48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $-68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $-13.0M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | -0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 0.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
VAC
| Cost Reimbursement | $467.0M | 38% |
| Time Share | $381.0M | 31% |
| Management And Exchange | $212.0M | 17% |
| Ancillary Revenues | $64.0M | 5% |
| Management Service | $55.0M | 4% |
| Service Other | $36.0M | 3% |
