vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH) and KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($437.6M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.6× KILROY REALTY CORP). Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs 6.3%, a 1.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.9% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $87.0M).
Alliance Laundry Systems LLC is an American provider of commercial laundry systems. The company designs, manufactures, and markets a line of commercial and industrial laundry equipment under various brands in over 100 countries. Among the company's products are washers, drying tumblers and ironers for the coin laundry, multi-housing laundries, institutional laundries and laundries for consumer residences. Alliance Laundry Systems manufactures products under the brands Speed Queen, Primus, Hue...
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
ALH vs KRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $437.6M | $272.2M |
| Net Profit | $32.9M | $17.1M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.9% | -5.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 620.3% | -73.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $272.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $437.6M | $279.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $289.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $270.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $286.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $384.3M | $289.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $280.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $278.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.9M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.3M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.6% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.2M | $179.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-136.4M | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $10.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $179.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.2M | $372.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $146.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $165.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.4M | $625.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $835.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $855.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-136.4M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-284.6M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.8M | $566.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.0M | $450.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.9% | 165.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.8% | 42.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.55× | 33.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $833.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $566.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $143.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $136.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $541.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $167.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $450.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $115.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $440.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $147.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $151.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 165.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 153.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 54.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.55× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALH
| Equipment Product Or Service | $275.7M | 63% |
| Other | $106.8M | 24% |
| Service Parts | $33.1M | 8% |
| Equipment Financing | $12.6M | 3% |
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
