vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Allot Ltd. (ALLT) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Allot Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.1M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.8× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Allot Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -7.0% vs -13.2%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 8.5%).
Allot Ltd., formerly Allot Communications, is an Israeli high-tech company that develops telecommunications software. The company is headquartered in Hod Hasharon, Israel.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
ALLT vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.1M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 72.1% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | -7.0% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.5% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-332.0K | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 72.1% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.3% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 68.5% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.1% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.2% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.1% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $60.1M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $99.7M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $154.1M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.1M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.7M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.7M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.1M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.3M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.4M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-6.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALLT
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
