vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Allot Ltd. (ALLT) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Allot Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.1M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.7× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -7.0%, a 44.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Allot Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.5% vs -1.5%). Allot Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.0M vs $-3.6M).
Allot Ltd., formerly Allot Communications, is an Israeli high-tech company that develops telecommunications software. The company is headquartered in Hod Hasharon, Israel.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
ALLT vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.1M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 72.1% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | -7.0% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.5% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $24.1M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $25.0M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | $32.8M | $6.3M |
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-332.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-20.7M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | $-6.2M | $-5.2M |
| Q2 25 | 72.1% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 68.5% | 52.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | 69.2% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | 68.7% | 41.8% |
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | -85.8% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | -19.8% | -49.9% |
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.1% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | -82.8% | -18.3% | ||
| Q2 22 | -19.0% | -82.4% |
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $1.19 | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.55 | $-10.66 | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.17 | $-1.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $60.1M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $99.7M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $154.1M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $60.1M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $15.5M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | $15.5M | $2.9M |
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $32.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $32.3M |
| Q2 25 | $99.7M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.7M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | $76.1M | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | $114.4M | $3.7M |
| Q2 25 | $154.1M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $49.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | $177.8M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | $229.3M | $42.7M |
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 9.49× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 8.68× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.4M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.0M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.5% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-6.0M | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | $-11.3M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | $-7.8M | $-4.1M |
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-11.6M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | $-9.1M | $-4.4M |
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | -46.4% | -31.5% | ||
| Q2 22 | -27.7% | -70.4% |
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | 1.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | 3.9% | 4.4% |
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.