vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALLURION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (ALUR) and PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALLURION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6M vs $2.7M, roughly 1.3× PureCycle Technologies, Inc.). ALLURION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — -167.0% vs -697.1%, a 530.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Robinson Technologies is a Japanese video game developer founded by Seth Robinson. The company produced the BBS door games Legend of the Red Dragon, Planets: The Exploration of Space and Growtopia, an experimental multiplayer creative sandbox created as a collaboration with Hamumu Software, released in 2013 for iOS, Android, Microsoft Windows, and macOS.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is a sustainable materials firm with proprietary advanced polypropylene recycling technology. It converts contaminated polypropylene waste into high-purity virgin-equivalent resin for use in consumer goods, automotive parts, packaging and industrial products, serving global partners.
ALUR vs PCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $-6.0M | $-18.8M |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -174.2% | -2196.1% |
| Net Margin | -167.0% | -697.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -35.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 71.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.69 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $-6.0M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.9M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.3M | $-144.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.6M | $-64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $-90.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.3M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $-85.6M |
| Q4 25 | 44.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 76.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 73.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -174.2% | -2196.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -362.3% | -1602.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -205.7% | -2763.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -130.5% | -2387.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -306.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -229.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -79.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -121.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -167.0% | -697.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -447.1% | -1167.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -276.3% | -8741.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.9% | 559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 162.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -70.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.69 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.53 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.28 | $-0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.31 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.22 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.40 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.34 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.96 | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.4M | $156.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-77.2M | $45.9M |
| Total Assets | $15.8M | $922.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $234.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7M | $284.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.7M | $83.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.7M | $25.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-77.2M | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.9M | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-64.0M | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.8M | $238.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-78.0M | $180.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-64.8M | $241.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-70.6M | $291.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-66.2M | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | $15.8M | $922.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $989.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4M | $787.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.8M | $798.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.7M | $788.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.5M | $719.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.0M | $734.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.3M | $-28.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-42.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1559.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 495.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-183.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.3M | $-28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.5M | $-38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | $-36.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.5M | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.3M | $-31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.9M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | $-39.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-42.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-53.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-53.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $-42.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $-50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.7M | $-53.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1559.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1743.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2747.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3409.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -214.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -79.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -93.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 495.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 160.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 521.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 949.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.33× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALUR
| ES | $2.2M | 60% |
| Other | $1.5M | 40% |
PCT
Segment breakdown not available.