vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC (TR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($196.3M vs $108.5M, roughly 1.8× AMBARELLA INC). TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs -13.9%, a 28.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 1.5%). TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($61.0M vs $31.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 13.2%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
AMBA vs TR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $196.3M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $232.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $148.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $193.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $150.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $153.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $15.8M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | 35.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | 32.7% |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $176.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $941.0M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $170.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $176.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $163.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | $159.4M |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $941.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $918.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $893.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $879.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $870.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $870.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $841.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $834.4M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $73.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $61.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | 31.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $96.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $68.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $21.4M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $750.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $16.9M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
TR
| Products | $194.3M | 99% |
| Rental And Royalty | $1.9M | 1% |
