vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and CN ENERGY GROUP. INC. (CNEY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CN ENERGY GROUP. INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.0M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.8× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -0.4%, a 64.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
EVE Energy Co., Ltd. is a Chinese battery manufacturing company founded by Liu Jincheng in 2001 that specializes in the manufacturing of lithium-ion batteries for energy storage systems and electric vehicles. Its headquarters are located in Huizhou, Guangdong, and it was first listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's ChiNext subsidiary in 2009. It is considered to be a Tier-1 battery supplier, and is the third largest energy storage battery cell maker in the world as of 2023. According to a st...
AMBO vs CNEY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $5.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-18.0K |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 0.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -0.4% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $16.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-11.0M | — |
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 9.2% | — |
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -19.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | -27.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -13.7% | — |
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | -36.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -67.1% | — |
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $102.3M |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $104.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $9.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $565.5K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $102.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $102.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $9.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $104.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $136.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
