vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (MKZR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.6M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.7× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -97.4%, a 161.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ambow Education Holding Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.3% vs -42.8%).
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment firm focused on acquiring, owning, and managing a diversified portfolio of income-generating commercial and residential real estate assets. It targets properties in high-growth regional markets across the U.S. to deliver consistent long-term returns to its investors.
AMBO vs MKZR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $4.6M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -97.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | -42.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | -0.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-2.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -102.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -76.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -117.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -136.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -56.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -150.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -58.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -65.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -97.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -67.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | -125.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -142.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -55.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -149.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -55.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -72.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-8.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.93 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-9.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $145.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $51.8M |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $238.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $142.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $135.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $51.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $56.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $59.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $66.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $73.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $82.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $86.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $238.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $241.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $236.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $237.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $236.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $243.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $233.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $226.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $644.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-595.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $743.3K |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
