vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NBY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.7× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -25.5%, a 89.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (126.1% vs 15.3%).
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is an Emeryville, California based clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, focused on products for eye care. Major products include Avenova, cleared by FDA for lid and lash cleansing as part of a regimen for Blepharitis. and NeutroPhase, used in treatment of Necrotizing Fasciitis
AMBO vs NBY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $4.8M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-1.2M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 65.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -37.2% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -25.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | 126.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | 70.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.7M | $3.5M |
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.0M | $-2.0M |
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 65.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | 66.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 68.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 51.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | 44.7% | 49.2% |
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -37.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -67.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -87.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -48.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -28.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | -27.7% | -29.7% |
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -66.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -122.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -195.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -70.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | -36.7% | -57.6% |
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.92 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-1.37 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-29.95 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $430.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $-129.0K |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $3.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $430.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $776.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $751.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $6.9M | $4.4M |
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-129.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $-617.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $160.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.4M | $8.6M |
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | $28.8M | $16.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -35.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-592.0K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-646.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-595.0K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-647.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -35.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -75.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -28.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -48.3% |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBO
Segment breakdown not available.
NBY
| Other | $2.4M | 51% |
| Total Product Revenue | $2.3M | 49% |