vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and YXT.COM GROUP HOLDING Ltd (YXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
YXT.COM GROUP HOLDING Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.1M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.1× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs 12.9%, a 51.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
YXT.COM GROUP HOLDING Ltd is a leading digital learning solution provider operating primarily in the Chinese market. It offers corporate learning management systems, customized training content, and integrated talent development services for enterprise, educational institution and public sector clients across industries.
AMBO vs YXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $3.1M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $405.6K |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 61.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -44.3% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | 12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $16.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $405.6K | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-11.0M | — |
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | 61.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 9.2% | — |
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -44.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | -27.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -13.7% | — |
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 23 | -36.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -67.1% | — |
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $8.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | — |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $15.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $9.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $9.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $136.4M | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
