vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.4× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -117.1%, a 181.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. is a precious metals royalty and streaming firm focused on gold, silver, and strategic mineral assets primarily across North America. It partners with mining operators to earn stable, leveraged returns without incurring the high costs and operational risks of direct mine ownership, catering to investors seeking low-volatility exposure to precious metals markets.
AMBO vs MTA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $3.8M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-4.4M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -117.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $981.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $16.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-11.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | 39.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 59.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 9.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -102.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -176.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -121.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | -27.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -13.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -117.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | -151.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -138.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -120.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -138.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | -36.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -67.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | — |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $9.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $9.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $136.4M | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
