vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) and ACTELIS NETWORKS INC (ASNS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amber International Holding Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9M vs $1.4M, roughly 1.4× ACTELIS NETWORKS INC). Amber International Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 87.5% vs -184.5%, a 272.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amber International Holding LtdAMBREarnings & Financial Report
Amber Road, Inc. (NYSE: AMBR) was a US-based software company specializing in Global Trade Management (GTM) solutions. It was acquired by E2open in 2019.
Actelis Networks Inc develops and manufactures high-performance broadband access networking solutions for telecom operators, enterprises and government entities. Its core products include Ethernet over copper systems delivering cost-effective high-speed connectivity over existing copper infrastructure, with key markets across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific.
AMBR vs ASNS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $1.4M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $-2.5M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 35.1% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -122.3% |
| Net Margin | 87.5% | -184.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -40.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-5.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $643.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $941.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $721.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $726.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-511.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-78.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 32.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 68.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -122.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -300.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -188.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -251.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -154.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -257.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -184.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -307.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 87.5% | -202.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -258.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -169.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -273.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-7.90 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.8M | $4.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $91.3M | $4.8M |
| Total Assets | $248.2M | $9.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $393.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $150.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $150.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $150.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $150.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $148.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.2M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $-2.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.49× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.1M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-203.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-204.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -28.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.49× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBR
Segment breakdown not available.
ASNS
| Europe Middle East And Africa | $1.1M | 83% |
| Other | $228.0K | 17% |
