vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) and BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (BMNR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3M vs $1.9M, roughly 1.2× Amber International Holding Ltd). Amber International Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 87.5% vs -226955.7%, a 227043.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amber International Holding LtdAMBREarnings & Financial Report
Amber Road, Inc. (NYSE: AMBR) was a US-based software company specializing in Global Trade Management (GTM) solutions. It was acquired by E2open in 2019.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies is a tech firm focused on developing and providing professional immersion cooling solutions for high-performance computing scenarios, including cryptocurrency mining rig clusters and data center infrastructure. Its products boost hardware operating efficiency, cut energy consumption for heat control, extend high-power computing equipment lifespan, and help clients reduce long-term operational costs.
AMBR vs BMNR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $2.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $-5.2B |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -238564.8% |
| Net Margin | 87.5% | -226955.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 90.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -533796.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-15.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.8M | $887.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $91.3M | $11.3B |
| Total Assets | $248.2M | $11.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $887.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $-228.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-228.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -9975.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 16.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.49× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-228.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-228.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -9975.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.49× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
