vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) and Cycurion, Inc. (CYCU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cycurion, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.5M vs $1.9M, roughly 1.9× Amber International Holding Ltd). Amber International Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 87.5% vs -141.2%, a 228.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amber International Holding LtdAMBREarnings & Financial Report
Amber Road, Inc. (NYSE: AMBR) was a US-based software company specializing in Global Trade Management (GTM) solutions. It was acquired by E2open in 2019.
AMBR vs CYCU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $3.5M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $-5.0M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 12.1% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -141.7% |
| Net Margin | 87.5% | -141.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -13.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -546.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-11.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $306.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-312.5K |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -141.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -118.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -96.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -260.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -141.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -81.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 87.5% | -136.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -264.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.59 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.8M | $5.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $91.3M | $20.1M |
| Total Assets | $248.2M | $33.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.3M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.2M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $-3.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -98.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.49× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-12.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.1M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-205.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-315.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-578.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-272.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-310.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-420.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-711.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-377.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | -98.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -66.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -94.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -72.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.49× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.89× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
