vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) and Token Cat Ltd (TC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Token Cat Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8M vs $1.9M, roughly 1.5× Amber International Holding Ltd). Amber International Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 87.5% vs -3.4%, a 90.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amber International Holding LtdAMBREarnings & Financial Report
Amber Road, Inc. (NYSE: AMBR) was a US-based software company specializing in Global Trade Management (GTM) solutions. It was acquired by E2open in 2019.
AMBR vs TC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $2.8M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $-93.0K |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 79.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -206.9% |
| Net Margin | 87.5% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -37.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 98.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $13.3M |
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-93.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-8.4M |
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 79.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 81.0% |
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -206.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -146.9% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -59.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -49.6% |
| Q2 25 | 87.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -33.3% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -62.9% |
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.8M | $150.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $91.3M | $4.6M |
| Total Assets | $248.2M | $28.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $150.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $689.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $4.8M |
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $91.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-787.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $21.4M |
| Q2 25 | $248.2M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $40.6M |
| Q2 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $-23.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.49× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $-4.1M | $-23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-7.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-8.3M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-8.3M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -34.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -62.2% |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 0.1% |
| Q2 25 | -2.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
