vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ametek (AME) and ELECTRO SENSORS INC (ELSE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ametek is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $2.8M, roughly 725.4× ELECTRO SENSORS INC). Ametek runs the higher net margin — 19.9% vs 3.7%, a 16.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ELECTRO SENSORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.8% vs 13.4%). Over the past eight quarters, ELECTRO SENSORS INC's revenue compounded faster (10.8% CAGR vs 7.3%).
AMETEK, Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate and global designer and manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices with headquarters in the United States and over 150 sites worldwide.
Polar Electro Oy is a Finnish manufacturer of sports training computers, particularly known for developing the world's first wireless heart rate monitor.
AME vs ELSE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $2.8M |
| Net Profit | $398.6M | $103.0K |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 50.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | -0.3% |
| Net Margin | 19.9% | 3.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | 14.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.9% | -48.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.73 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | $398.6M | $103.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.4M | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $59.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.8M | $-64.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.3M | $201.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $340.2M | $238.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.7M | $-4.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $310.9M | $11.0K |
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 51.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | 49.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.1% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | -4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | -2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.73 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.60 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.55 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.47 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.34 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.0M | $10.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.6B | $14.8M |
| Total Assets | $16.1B | $15.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.2M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $619.7M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.3M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.6M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.8M | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $14.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6B | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $13.8M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2B | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6B | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | $14.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $584.3M | $20.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $527.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.47× | 0.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $584.3M | $20.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $440.9M | $395.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.1M | $277.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.5M | $-30.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $550.0M | $-277.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.2M | $362.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.4M | $-158.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.2M | $202.0K |
| Q4 25 | $527.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | $389.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $498.3M | $-298.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.9M | $358.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.0M | $-184.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.3% | -12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | -8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | 1.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 4.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | -1.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.43× | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | 18.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AME
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.1B | 54% |
| Electronic Instruments Group | $620.1M | 31% |
| Transferred Over Time | $294.6M | 15% |
ELSE
Segment breakdown not available.
