vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ELECTRO SENSORS INC (ELSE) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $2.8M, roughly 760.5× ELECTRO SENSORS INC). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 3.7%, a 12.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ELECTRO SENSORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.8% vs 11.3%). Over the past eight quarters, ELECTRO SENSORS INC's revenue compounded faster (10.8% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Polar Electro Oy is a Finnish manufacturer of sports training computers, particularly known for developing the world's first wireless heart rate monitor.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
ELSE vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $103.0K | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 50.3% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.3% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 3.7% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.8% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.8% | 842.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $103.0K | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.0K | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.0K | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-64.0K | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $201.0K | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.0K | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0K | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.3% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.2% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.6% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.4% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.2% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.3% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.8% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.6% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.9% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.2% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.6M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.8M | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $15.7M | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.6M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.6M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.7M | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8M | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.7M | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.7M | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5M | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.0K | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $395.0K | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.0K | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-30.0K | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-277.0K | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.0K | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-158.0K | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $389.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-298.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $358.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-184.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.19× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.90× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.69× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.38× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.52× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
