vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COGNEX CORP (CGNX) and ELECTRO SENSORS INC (ELSE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COGNEX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.3M vs $2.8M, roughly 91.6× ELECTRO SENSORS INC). COGNEX CORP runs the higher net margin — 12.9% vs 3.7%, a 9.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ELECTRO SENSORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.8% vs 9.9%). Over the past eight quarters, ELECTRO SENSORS INC's revenue compounded faster (10.8% CAGR vs 9.4%).
Cognex Corporation is an American manufacturer of machine vision systems, software and sensors. Cognex is headquartered in Natick, Massachusetts, USA with offices in more than 20 countries.
Polar Electro Oy is a Finnish manufacturer of sports training computers, particularly known for developing the world's first wireless heart rate monitor.
CGNX vs ELSE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.3M | $2.8M |
| Net Profit | $32.7M | $103.0K |
| Gross Margin | 65.7% | 50.3% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | -0.3% |
| Net Margin | 12.9% | 3.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.9% | 14.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.2% | -48.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.20 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $252.3M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $276.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $249.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.0M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $229.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $239.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.8M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | $103.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.5M | $59.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.6M | $-64.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.3M | $201.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.6M | $238.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.2M | $-4.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.0M | $11.0K |
| Q4 25 | 65.7% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.6% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.4% | 51.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.8% | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.7% | 49.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.9% | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.6% | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.3% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.4% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | -4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 12.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | -2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.14 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $262.9M | $10.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $14.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $15.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $262.9M | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.9M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.3M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.7M | $10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.1M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $176.6M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.9M | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $14.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $13.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $14.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $74.9M | $20.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $72.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.29× | 0.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $236.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $74.9M | $20.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.5M | $395.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.6M | $277.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.5M | $-30.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $-277.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.3M | $362.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.8M | $-158.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6M | $202.0K |
| Q4 25 | $72.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.0M | $389.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | $-298.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | $358.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.3M | $-184.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | -12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | -8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.29× | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.95× | 1.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.05× | 4.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | -1.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.90× | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.13× | 18.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
