vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC. (AMKR) and PAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP (PAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.7× AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.).
Amkor Technology, Inc. is a semiconductor product packaging and test services provider. The company has been headquartered in Arizona, since 2005, when it was moved from West Chester, Pennsylvania, also in the United States. The company's Arizona headquarters was originally in Chandler, then later moved to Tempe. The company was founded in 1968 and, as of 2022, has approximately 31,000 employees worldwide and a reported $7.1 billion in sales.
Pan American Silver Corporation is a mining company based in Canada with operations in Latin America. The company has mines and other projects in Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina.
AMKR vs PAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2022
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $83.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 14.2% | 27.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 27.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 295.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $-1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $83.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.51 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.6B | — |
| Total Assets | $8.3B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.28× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $145.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 29.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.75× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $145.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $258.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $537.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $212.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-77.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-55.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-31.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMKR
| Advanced products (1) | $1.4B | 81% |
| Mainstream products (2) | $313.0M | 19% |
PAAS
Segment breakdown not available.
