vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and RESEARCH FRONTIERS INC (REFR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($346.7M vs $72.1K, roughly 4807.1× RESEARCH FRONTIERS INC). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.4% vs -1061.5%, a 1076.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.9% vs -59.5%). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.2M vs $-466.1K). Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.5% CAGR vs -52.0%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
Research Frontiers is an American nanotechnology company based in Woodbury, New York that was founded by Robert Saxe in 1965 to develop light control technology from Polaroid known as smart glass. The company develops and licenses its patented SPD-SmartGlass technology. The company currently has six full-time employees.
DLB vs REFR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $346.7M | $72.1K |
| Net Profit | $53.3M | $-765.6K |
| Gross Margin | 87.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.9% | -1072.5% |
| Net Margin | 15.4% | -1061.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | -59.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.4% | -25.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | $72.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $359.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $129.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $559.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $178.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $354.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | $288.8M | $489.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $364.5M | $313.4K |
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | $-765.6K | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $-298.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $-803.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $-177.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $-607.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $-166.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $-94.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $97.8M | $-442.6K |
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 87.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 89.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | -1072.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | -84.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | -627.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | -42.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | -350.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -65.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.7% | -23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.9% | -149.9% |
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | -1061.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | -83.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | -618.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | -31.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | -341.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | -47.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.3% | -19.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.8% | -141.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.40 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.01 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $644.6M | $664.3K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $933.6K |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $2.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | $664.3K | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $825.4M | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $933.6K | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | $3.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $54.8M | $-465.9K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.2M | $-466.1K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.5% | -646.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $386.0M | $-1.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $-465.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.8M | $-143.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $-78.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $-641.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $47.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.2M | $-257.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.3M | $-186.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $181.4M | $-391.1K |
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | $-466.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.6M | $-143.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $-78.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $-641.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $46.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.8M | $-258.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $-187.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $172.5M | $-391.2K |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | -646.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.7% | -40.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | -60.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | -114.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.7% | -72.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.3% | -124.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.49× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.85× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing Brodcast Revenue | $100.3M | 29% |
| Licensing Mobile Revenue | $74.9M | 22% |
| Licensing Other Revenue | $70.2M | 20% |
| Licensing CE Revenue | $45.6M | 13% |
| Licensing PC Revenue | $28.7M | 8% |
| Products And Services | $26.9M | 8% |
REFR
Segment breakdown not available.
