vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC (CCBG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.5M vs $63.5M, roughly 1.2× CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 21.6%, a 136.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 6.0%). CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($80.0M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 6.0%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.
AMSC vs CCBG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $63.5M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $13.7M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 29.3% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 21.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 6.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 4.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $65.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $61.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $59.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $59.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $58.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $56.5M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 31.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 27.2% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 27.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.80 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.93 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.99 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.83 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.74 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $552.9M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $552.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $540.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $526.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $512.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $495.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $476.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $461.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $448.3M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $4.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $87.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $80.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 126.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 12.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 6.39× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $150.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $87.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $21.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $80.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $19.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $54.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 126.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 48.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 31.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 91.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 22.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 6.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 2.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 1.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 4.86× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
CCBG
Segment breakdown not available.
