vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and TRICO BANCSHARES (TCBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRICO BANCSHARES is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($109.4M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.5× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). TRICO BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 251.6% vs 158.1%, a 93.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 9.0%). TRICO BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($127.9M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 5.4%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Trico Bancshares is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company operating Tri Counties Bank. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services including deposit products, mortgages, small business loans, and wealth management, primarily serving consumers and SMEs in Northern California.
AMSC vs TCBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $109.4M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $33.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 42.6% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 251.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 15.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $107.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $103.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $98.5M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $26.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 40.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 251.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 221.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $157.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $298.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $314.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $145.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $320.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $206.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $82.8M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $9.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $133.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $127.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 116.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $222.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $133.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $109.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $31.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $127.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $24.1M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 24.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 3.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
TCBK
Segment breakdown not available.
