vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Urban Edge Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.6M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.8× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 17.1%, a 141.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 12.2%). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 11.6%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
AMSC vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $3.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
