vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMAZE HOLDINGS, INC. (AMZE) and Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd (DDL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMAZE HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 19743.5% vs 5.8%, a 19737.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
AMAZE is a virtual reality concert production company founded in July 2015 by former executives and founders of Kakao. Its headquarters is located in Los Angeles, California, with a second office in Seoul, South Korea. AMAZE develops VR concert experiences for global pop and K-pop artists, distributed via VR headset apps and theatrical installations.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd operates a leading on-demand grocery e-commerce platform primarily serving the Chinese market. It provides fresh produce, daily necessities, ready-to-eat meals, and household staples to urban consumers, leveraging optimized supply chains and localized logistics networks to offer fast, reliable 30-minute delivery services, prioritizing product freshness and user convenience.
AMZE vs DDL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2022
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $-217.2K | $115.3M |
| Net Profit | $-42.9M | $6.7M |
| Gross Margin | 178.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 20191.9% | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | 19743.5% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -457.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -38251.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.06 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $-217.2K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $869.9K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.2K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.5K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-42.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-111.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-315.3K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-879.6K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 178.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 93.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -62.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -106.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 20191.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -347.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -492.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3138.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1190.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -488.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1247.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1159.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19743.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -410.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -580.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3469.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -183.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -498.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1247.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1159.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-4.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.85 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.92 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.53 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.30 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $113.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.2M | $135.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.8M | $4.5M |
| Total Assets | $34.2M | $178.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.74× | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.8K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $856.7K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $884.9K | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-585.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-400.2K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-613.7K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-332.8K | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.