vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. (AOMR) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $10.9M, roughly 1.2× Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc.). Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 103.9% vs -13.2%, a 117.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 10.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 12.7%).
Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust focused on investing in residential mortgage assets, including non-agency mortgage-backed securities, residential mortgage loans, and credit-linked real estate instruments. It serves U.S. institutional and retail investors, targeting competitive risk-adjusted returns through regular income and long-term capital growth.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
AOMR vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.9M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $11.3M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 103.9% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.4% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 175.2% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.9M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $767.0K | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.1M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.2M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-273.0K | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.6% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 103.9% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 112.1% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 203.5% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.6% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 345.9% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.9% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 150.1% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.62 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.6M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $267.5M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $41.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.5M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.4M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $267.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.4M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.1M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.8M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $263.3M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 8.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-407.0M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -35.96× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-407.0M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-173.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.6M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-201.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-221.5M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-212.4M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.2M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.2M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | -35.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.83× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.12× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AOMR
| Nonrelated Party | $6.4M | 59% |
| Other | $4.5M | 41% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
